nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
您当前所在位置: 首页> 文献列表> 新环保法实施对重污染企业融资影响及后果研究
2022, 02, v.42 96-113
新环保法实施对重污染企业融资影响及后果研究
基金项目(Foundation): 安徽省社会科学项目(AHSKF2018D55)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19559/j.cnki.12-1387.2022.02.007
发布时间: 2022-01-18
出版时间: 2022-01-18
网络发布时间: 2022-01-18
移动端阅读
摘要:

本文以2015年新环保法实施为准自然实验,以污染行业上市公司为实验对象,采用双重差分模型研究新环保法实施对重污染企业债务融资的影响及其后果。研究结果表明,新环保法实施显著减少了重污染企业的长期贷款,并且对重污染企业产生了信贷约束效应;相应地,导致了重污染企业行为;进一步研究发现,新环保法实施后,污染企业商业信用显著增加,这为短贷长投提供了融资来源;分样本检验发现,国有企业和大规模重污染企业信贷融资约束效应更明显。本文还发现,新环保法实施后,重污染企业规模投资显著减少,而研发投资并未明显增加,经营风险则显著上升。本文研究表明新环保法发挥了信贷资源配置效应,抑制了重污染企业投资规模,但目前还未能实现重污染企业技术升级。

Abstract:

Taking the implementation of new environmental protection law in 2015 as the quasi-natural experiment and the polluting industry listed companies as the experimental object, this paper uses the difference-in-difference model to study the impact and consequences of the new environmental protection law implemented on the debt financing of heavily polluting enterprises. The results show that environmental law implementation significantly reduces the pollution enterprise long-term loans, indicating that the new environmental law has a credit constraint effect on heavy polluting enterprises. Accordingly, it leads to the stress strategic response behavior of short-term loan and long-term investment of heavily polluting enterprises. Further research finds that after the implementation of the new environmental protection law, the commercial credit of polluting enterprises increased significantly, which provides a source of financing for short-term loan and long-term investment. The sub sample test shows that the credit financing constraint effect of state-owned enterprises and large-scale heavily polluting enterprises is more obvious. This paper also finds that after the implementation of the new environmental protection law, the scale investment of heavy polluting enterprises decreased significantly, while the R&D investment does not increase, and the operation risks rise up. The findings of this paper show that the new environmental protection law has played a role in the allocation of credit resources and restrained the investment scale of heavy polluting enterprises, but it has not realized the technological upgrading of heavy polluting enterprises at present.

参考文献

[1]周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007(7):36-50.

[2]LUO J B.How does smog affect firms’ investment behavior?A natural experiment based on a sudden surge in the PM2.5 index [J].China Journal of Accounting Research,2017,10(4):359-378.

[3]TOMBE T,WINTER J.Environmental policy and misallocation:the productivity effect of intensity standards [J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2015,72(7):137-163.

[4]GREENSTONE M.The impacts of environmental regulations on industrial activity:evidence from the 1970 and 1977 clean air act amendments and the census of manufactures [J].Journal of Political Economy,2002,110(6):1175-1219.

[5]THOMPSON P,COWTON C J.Bringing the environment into bank lending:implications for environmental reporting [J].British Accounting Review,2004,36(2):1-218.

[6]CLARKSON P M,LI Y,RICHARDSON G D,et al.Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure:an empirical analysis [J].Accounting Organizations & Society,2008,33(4-5):303-327.

[7]刘常建,许为宾,蔡兰,等.环保压力与重污染企业的银行贷款契约——基于“PM(2.5)爆表”事件的经验证据[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(12):121-130.

[8]GUO M M,KUAI Y C,LIU X Y.Stock market response to environmental policies:evidence from heavily polluting firms in China [J].Economic Modelling,2020(86):306-316.

[9]LIU X H,WANG E X,CAI D T.Environmental regulation and corporate financing:a quasi-natural experiment evidence from China [J].Sustainability,2018,10(11):4028.

[10]罗党论,赖再洪.重污染企业投资与地方官员晋升——基于地级市1999—2010年数据的经验证据[J].会计研究,2016(4):42-48+95.

[11]苏冬蔚,连莉莉.绿色信贷是否影响重污染企业的投融资行为?[J].金融研究,2018(12):123-137.

[12]倪娟,孔令文.环境信息披露、银行信贷决策与债务融资成本——来自我国深沪两市A股重污染行业上市公司的经验证据[J].经济评论,2016(1):147-156.

[13]王兵,戴敏,武文杰.环保基地政策提高了企业环境绩效吗?——来自东莞市企业微观面板数据的证据[J].金融研究,2017(4):143-160.

[14]刘志远,王存峰,彭涛,等.政策不确定性与企业风险承担:机遇预期效应还是损失规避效应[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(6):15-27.

[15]余明桂,潘红波.政府干预、法治、金融发展与国有企业银行贷款[J].金融研究,2008(9):1-22.

[16]BOOMHOWER J.Drilling like there’s no tomorrow:bankruptcy,insurance,and environmental risk [J].American Economic Review,2019,109(2):391-426.

[17]韩立岩,蔡立新,尹力博.中国证券市场的绿色激励:一个四因素模型[J].金融研究,2017(1):145-161.

[18]李培功,沈艺峰.社会规范、资本市场与环境治理:基于机构投资者视角的经验证据[J].世界经济,2011,34(6):126-146.

[19]汪海凤,白雪洁,李爽.环境规制、不确定性与企业的短期化投资偏向——基于环境规制工具异质性的比较分析[J].财贸研究,2018,29(12):80-93.

[20]姜英兵,崔广慧.环保产业政策对企业环保投资的影响:基于污染上市公司的经验证据[J].改革,2019(2):87-101.

[21]CHEN Z,KAHN M E,LIU Y,et al.The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China [J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2018(88):468-485.

[22]方军雄.所有制、制度环境与信贷资金配置[J].经济研究,2007(12):82-92.

[23]FRANK M Z,GOYAL V K.Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure [J].Journal of Financial Economics,2003,67(2):217-248.

[24]钟凯,程小可,张伟华.货币政策适度水平与企业“短贷长投”之谜[J].管理世界,2016(3):87-98+114+188.

[25]潘红波,饶晓琼.《环境保护法》、制度环境与企业环境绩效[J].山西财经大学学报,2019,41(3):71-86.

[26]李百兴,王博.新环保法实施增大了企业的技术创新投入吗?——基于PSM-DID方法的研究[J].审计与经济研究,2019,34(1):87-96.

[27]刘星,魏锋,詹宇.我国上市公司融资顺序的实证研究[J].会计研究,2004(6):66-72.

[28]李广子,刘力.债务融资成本与民营信贷歧视[J].2009(12):137-150.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19559/j.cnki.12-1387.2022.02.007

中图分类号:X322;F832.4;F832.51

引用信息:

[1]许罡.新环保法实施对重污染企业融资影响及后果研究[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2022,42(02):96-113.DOI:10.19559/j.cnki.12-1387.2022.02.007.

基金信息:

安徽省社会科学项目(AHSKF2018D55)

发布时间:

2022-01-18

出版时间:

2022-01-18

网络发布时间:

2022-01-18

检 索 高级检索